And if they're made, would he then have an obligation under the ethics code to recuse himself if the case came before him? Well, you know, our judicial code in Wisconsin counsels judges not to comment on pending cases. Brad Schimmel has repeatedly flouted [the rule against commenting on pending cases]. that rule. And you know, yes, I believe that he should recuse himself if he's in a position to make any decisions regarding that 1849 law or any claim or case involving constitutional right to reproductive health care decision making. (03:40–03:44)
CLAIM
Asserts that Brad Schimmel has repeatedly violated the rule against commenting on pending cases.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
