So I think this is a sort of test case for the scope of how much they want to intervene in the approval process around sort of discrete decisions and, you know, redecide past decisions, relitigate past decisions. I think past decisions should be settled in the absence of new information. Obviously, the death is tragic and is new information. That's why I think it will prompt a reevaluation of this. (07:47–07:51)
CLAIM
Asserts that past decisions should remain unchanged unless new information arises.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
