Either level will have devastating and counterproductive consequences across numerous programs. This would mean cutting rural development initiatives. The 22% cut would reduce much needed investments in rural broadband, electricity, water and waste systems, and housing. at a time when we really, really want to lift our rural communities. It would mean cutting our investment in farm and conservation programs, agricultural research, food for peace grants and the McGovern Dole program. (00:29–00:38)
CLAIM
Asserts that a 22% cut would reduce investments in rural infrastructure and services.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
