And in Department of Commerce, obviously, the record evidence did support the conclusion, but nonetheless, the decision was based on a, you know, contrived reason. That is the reason why we think Pretext claims are reviewable. But it doesn't matter because the first two claims are, are much more canonically sort of old, you know, older than Sec. V. Chainry. You know, I think that decision really becomes reviewable. (01:34–01:36)
CLAIM
Asserts that pretext claims should be subject to review.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.