What we're saying is this is such an important deal, it really rises to the level of a treaty and treaties need to be ratified by the United States Senate. And we're just laying out the fact that If it doesn't get ratified by the Senate, if it doesn't get approved by Congress, it's not binding. I mean, the next president can just ignore it, and Congress really doesn't have to abide by it as well. But, Senator, did this in any way ruin, though, any type of bipartisan support for a deal on Iran? (02:22–02:31)
CLAIM
Asserts that the Iran deal is not binding without Senate ratification or Congressional approval.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
