My main beef is the debate in the House was pretty lacking in terms of looking at the numbers we really need to be looking at throughout. 1.5 trillion sounds like a lot, but over 10 years it's barely a rounding error. And the $89 trillion will spend in the $22 trillion additional deficit, which again, we can argue. I'm not a big fan of the CBO scores, their static scoring versus dynamic. (01:40–01:46)
CLAIM
Asserts that $1.5 trillion is a minor amount over a 10-year period in the context of federal spending.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
