The next one is Wisconsin Supreme Court delivers Win for Environmentalists in fight over Forever Chemicals. I think that's the pfas. Your thoughts and takeaways. The court is saying the DNR can go after someone even if there's not rules ahead of time determining that that pollutant is actually something that they can regulate or is actually a pollutant. So that part's kind of scary. But it's also more important now than ever to protect Innocent landowners. We've talked about PFAS on your show. (13:43–13:55)
CLAIM
Asserts that the court ruled the DNR can pursue action without pre-established rules on pollutants.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
