And if you in the history of that was the EPACT05 and the negotiations in this very room on the best path forward to continue to provide domestic. So you not only oppose repeal, but you defend extension? Yes, sir. Finally, I understand that Until recently, a tax credit was available for complying with EPA's low sulfur diesel requirements. and an extension of this credit is included in a pending Senate tax extenders bill, which I'm sure you're aware of, that's estimated to be a $20 million cost to the taxpayers. (02:55–03:02)
CLAIM
Asserts that a tax credit was available for complying with EPA's low sulfur diesel requirements.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
