By the way, Shelby county versus Holder, it removed the oversight of potentially discriminatory state voting restrictions. In Enrucco vs Common Cause, that was 2018. The court did not act on partisan gerrymandering, literally making it legal for there to be partisanship as the basis of a new map. And of course, in Trump v. United States, that his court basically put the president above the law. The court has gutted one of the last remaining enforceable sections of the Voting Rights act. (02:46–02:59)
CLAIM
Asserts that the court's inaction legalized partisan gerrymandering.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
