He said no classified information was discussed. That was the answer he gave at his Senate confirmation hearing. Now it's obvious that answer was a complete lie. Last week, The Pentagon's watchdog confirmed there was classified information in that signal chat. So was Kent being intentionally dishonest, or does he not understand what classified information is? Either way, it is completely disqualifying, which, as I think I've made clear, is pretty much the pattern here. (03:19–03:27)
CLAIM
Asserts that classified information was indeed discussed in the Signal Gate chat.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
