That will be part of the conversation that's had at the commission meeting, but it does not appear that that would be most likely appropriate or something that would be part of that process. But Voters do have the opportunity to choose someone to be able to assist them under both state and federal law. As to the unanimous approval for more than a million dollars and an inspector general for the elections commission, why is that needed? So I really think it's a result of needs. (01:49–01:57)
CLAIM
Asserts that voters can choose an assistor under state and federal law.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
