So, Secretary Driscoll, I have a number of questions about your plans going forward. You previously. First, you previously committed to negotiating in good faith. Do you still stand by that commitment? Yes. Unequivocally. The Army EISS were rejected by the Hawaii Land Board last summer because of several noted deficiencies, including their failure to adequately address the cultural and historical impacts of continued training. Mr. Secretary. Ken, I get your commitment that the army will resubmit their EISs to address these deficiencies. (02:41–02:56)
CLAIM
Asserts that the Army EISS were rejected due to deficiencies, including failure to address cultural and historical impacts.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
