That could still be built into the code. So we're just avoiding the use cases. Let me ask you a second question though. If Anthropic's product is. Then it seems like it's. What they're using is safe enough now to remain in our soldiers hands in a shooting war against a foreign adversary. How does the Department justify branding an American company? A sabotage and subversion risk under a statute that Congress wrote for foreign spies seems a little bit extreme. (03:33–03:41)
CLAIM
Asserts that the current use of Anthropic's product is deemed safe for soldiers in active conflict.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.