It would align towards removing one more layer of government that allow us to both identify recipients and delivery mechanisms quicker and more effectively. So generally, your perceptions We are very open to that transition [of Food for Peace to the Department of Agriculture] being done. Obviously, whether it's done statutorily or otherwise, it's something something would be open to because we think it has the potential to deliver assistance much quicker, much faster, much, much more efficiently and perhaps to a broader set of people. (03:28–03:31)
CLAIM
Asserts openness to transferring Food for Peace to the Department of Agriculture.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.