That was their justification. What EPA had done previously under section 202 was to look at local and regional impacts. The problem for EPA in 2009 was that they didn't have the science to be able to reach that justification. That's why they had to expand it to this new approach of combating global climate change. We have a first, and I would also point out that what we put out this week is a proposal. (07:03–07:12)
CLAIM
Asserts that in 2009, the EPA lacked scientific justification for its actions.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
