You stated then, as you stated several times, the importance of cape's independence as an evaluator. Obviously, I mean, you really are. CAPE really is the truth teller, if you will, on cost and performance. However, I have been concerned in recent years that the independent assessment sometimes gets diluted by advocacy of a particular platform or program. And sometimes it's my sense that advocacy is masked by scenarios, chosen scenarios of evaluation. Does that happen at cape, either inadvertently or by some bias or. Or even orders from leadership? (00:30–00:41)
CLAIM
Asserts concern that independent assessments by CAPE may be influenced by advocacy.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
