I mean, if we agree with you about extraterritoriality, who's making the decision as to whether or not there are direct, traceable, and particular effects in this case? So it is a threshold determination for the court as a matter of federal law. Isn't it a matter of fact, though, whether or not there are direct, traceable and particularized effects within the state? So, Justice Jackson, I think what I would say about that is it's a slightly different inquiry from, say, the causation inquiry as a matter of state law. (03:35–03:42)
STATEMENT
Questions whether the existence of direct, traceable, and particularized effects within the state is a factual matter.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.