But the problem then if that was true, then no one would be able to stop these companies because they'd have no downside in pursuing fraud. Because if all you could ever get was restitution, The state has to have a mechanism to protect consumers because consumers on average don't have the ability to go sue these companies. We can, but you can and you will. Um, I'm told that a lot of Indian scammers or you know, Chinese scammers or whoever the scammers are that they are, they're watching what I'm doing. (04:07–04:14)
CLAIM
Asserts the necessity of state mechanisms to protect consumers from fraudulent companies.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
