Well, that's just it seems to me that's just an objection to the application of the rule in your particular case. It doesn't represent a basis for throwing out the basic, the fundamental approach. I think it's more than that because under this definition, this meaningful benchmark definition, not only is the court, the Ninth Circuit, attempting to pre define what can count for … (00:06–00:12)
STATEMENT
Asserts that the objection does not justify discarding the fundamental approach.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.