So he caught my interest when he said we shouldn't be lowering, we should be expecting high standards. And then he kind of pivoted a little bit to criticizing The process [for changing scoring methods] was done behind closed doors without any input from stakeholders. And he was right on both counts. Apart from the scoring, why does the bill also call to revert back to how the scores are described, for example, instead of below basic as previously, to developing, just to go back for consistency? (13:39–13:44)
CLAIM
Asserts that the process lacked transparency and stakeholder involvement.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
