… publicly, which is I support the talking filibuster if that's what it takes to get the Save America act passed. And I would be open to reforms of the filibuster. Historically, the filibuster has changed over time, depending on different circumstances. So I don't think it's a particularly radical statement to make, and that's my opinion. Is it a mistake for the President to not endorse at this point, given the amount of money you guys are spending? (01:13–01:20)
CLAIM
Asserts that the filibuster has historically evolved based on circumstances.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
