So first of all, I believe that this is misguided. We've heard from the intelligence community that this requirement will slow down collection of intelligence, including during occasions where time is of the essence. So Courts have found that none of these queries require or implicate Fourth Amendment protection. So the very foundation for this argument has been rejected by the courts that have reviewed it. (05:54–06:00)
CLAIM
Asserts that courts have ruled that queries of Section 702 data do not require Fourth Amendment protection.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
