Yeah. This provision. So you're saying that essentially the way that you read this language is that it's not compelling the federal court to require security of a plaintiff. That's a situation. Now. The judge can waive it. We're saying it should compel the court to have the security there. Correct. Yeah. Who's saying the same thing? Let's go back to my core example. All right. We'll walk through it together here. A constituent in Ohio who believes that their information was improperly released by the irs. (06:50–06:56)
CLAIM
Asserts that the provision should compel courts to require security.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
