Save the outrage. They've done it to me. And take your whining someplace else. I yield back. Mr. Tiffany, what I would say to you, with all respect, I don't believe...that a markup of this nature has been held in which you have been told...that lands in your congressional district would be conveyed or disposed of or protected. or protected. I suspect that that's the latter, of which is what you'd object to. But nonetheless, putting that aside, I cannot point to a precedent, and I really. (07:18–07:37)
CLAIM
Asserts that there is no precedent for a markup where a representative is informed about land actions in their district without participation.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
