PolitiQuote

Political speech, timestamped and in context

Jeff Merkley: “In 1996, Congress tried to give the President a line item veto and the Supreme Court struck it down.”

Featuring: Jeff Merkley, Democratic | U.S. Senate from Oregon

Watch on YouTube

'The Constitution Is Not Optional': Jeff Merkley Blasts Trump's 'Line-Item Veto' Pocket Rescission

Published

And unconstitutional because the Constitution creates a separation of powers with the power of the purse belonging to Congress, not the President. Now, this has been tested a few times. In 1996, Congress tried to give the President a line item veto and the Supreme Court struck it down. They struck it down as unconstitutional because it violated the constitutional's separation of powers. And yesterday, the independent nonpartisan Government Accountability Office reaffirmed that this strategy by Trump called a pocket rescission, a fancy name for a line item veto is illegal. (01:20–01:29)

STATEMENT

Asserts that the Supreme Court struck down a line item veto law in 1996.

This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.


Jeff Merkley

See the main statements from Jeff Merkley in this video

Report A Transcription Error

Please report any error in the automated transcription.

About PolitiQuote

PolitiQuote is a civic library index to statements made by politicians in publicly available video records. The index is created automatically from transcripts, with no editorial oversight or analysis. Highlighted quotes are selected by AI. Words may be added in parentheses to offer context for the quote. There may be errors in the transcription and display, so listen to the video to ensure accuracy.

PolitiQuote is a service of Gigafact Foundation, a nonpartisan nonprofit advancing facts and information transparency, community by community.

Visit gigafact.org to learn more.