So any suggestion that he wasn't there to do harm is absurd. We will prove when he purchased these guns, they were purchased in California. Why is that relevant? It is relevant because He crossed interstate lines with those firearms. And those are the firearms that he used on the night of the 25th, or attempted to use, at the very least. Now, the manifesto also makes clear about his expected rules of engagement. (08:30–08:35)
CLAIM
Asserts that the defendant crossed state lines with firearms.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.