The reason that we need to do something about this court is because this court has decided that it will bend to the will of a wannabe king. We have never in the history of this country needed a court to say that absolute immunity should be given to a president. Because historically, we don't actually keep criminals in the presidency. We know that even after he had been found guilty by a jury of his peers, y' all went out and y' all wanted to say, yes, this is our guy. (03:52–04:00)
CLAIM
Asserts that historically, the U.S. has not required a court to grant absolute immunity to a president.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
