Nearly every case we saw probation, we saw six months. Peters sentence, he says, was based too much on what she said, not what she did. The appellate court raised the same concern. Clearly her free speech, however much we disagree with it, was used as a factor in that sentencing. Mesa County District Attorney Dan Rubenstein disagrees. This was not just a one act. This was a months long pattern of deception to try to violate every security protocol we had as the person we entrusted specifically for that. (01:39–01:46)
CLAIM
Asserts that Tina Peters' free speech was considered in her sentencing.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.