Not 90% degradation, not 90% landfilling. Underground injection. None of these cost more money. They all cost more money because they're early incipient technologies. None of them are 90% cheaper. There is no plan from the EPA to protect the state that you championed when you were a member of Congress. You want me to keep going on technologies and companies. They're all by the way they're leaning into research and development on top of it. (04:50–04:55)
CLAIM
Asserts that the EPA lacks a plan to protect states from PFAS contamination.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
