And during the course of this administration last six months, we've seen several such attacks without a commensurate response by the federal government. So that is why We're using the FACE Act, I believe, for the first time in history today to prosecute an attack civilly on a house of worship. Yes. So you said there are about 50. Protesters, some of whom are named in the complaint. Can you explain which ones are named and why you chose to do so? (05:30–05:40)
CLAIM
Asserts this is the first civil use of the FACE Act to prosecute an attack on a house of worship.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
