I can't speak specifically to which those were. Decisions are made at the department level, but I can't speak to what those allegations were. We're told it was still 11% under your administration. When fraud indicators appear in a program funded by federal taxpayers, do you believe the responsibility, the responsible action, is to pause payments until those concerns are investigated? (03:11–03:17)
CLAIM
Asserts that the improper payment rate in Minnesota remained at 11% under the current administration.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
