There are some, in my opinion, we should massively reduce what can be patented. Because the whole point of patenting is to maximize innovation, not inhibit it. And in my opinion, maybe a controversial opinion, Most patents inhibit innovation, they do not help it. But there are case, I want to do one single out cases like where, such as a phase three clinical trial, it might cost a billion dollars, but then the drugs thereafter cost a few dollars to manufacture. (22:19–22:23)
CLAIM
Asserts that the majority of patents hinder rather than promote innovation.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
_(cropped).jpg)