Now, I'm not going to fight with you today about whether this rollback is legal. I don't think it is. These standards are based on the endangerment finding, which states that the scientific fact that … The EPA's own analysis from February said that the rollback means more mercury, more arsenic, lead, heavy metals, and soot will get into our air. … that's not what I said. (00:48–01:01)
CLAIM
Asserts that the EPA's analysis indicates increased pollution from the rollback.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.