The House speaker said that it could have negative side effects if it was imposed through Congress. Are you concerned about that? Have you talked about. No, I'm not. I think that people that are paying 28% interest should be protected. We're talking about for a one year period. But when you Have a bank, whether it's Jamie Dimon or anybody else, charging people 28, 32%. 30%. 31%. One case, 35%. (02:11–02:16)
CLAIM
Asserts that people paying high interest rates should be protected.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
