Political speech, timestamped and in context

Daniel S. Sullivan: “The New York Times article isn't a he said, she said. It's got a ton of text messages in it.”

Featuring: Daniel S. Sullivan, Republican | U.S. Senate from Alaska

Dan Sullivan Accuses Mary Peltola Of Helping 'Rig' Alaska Senate Race

Published November 1, 2026

… her vision for Alaska, but to devise a secret plan to cheat and rig the election in her favor and to cheat with regard to Alaskans. So to your question, The New York Times article isn't a he said, she said. It's got a ton of text messages in it. All between the people who are undertaking the scheme. Again, her chief of staff, this guy, Anton McFarland, I know him well. (01:36–01:44)

STATEMENT

Asserts that the New York Times article contains numerous text messages as evidence.

This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.

See the main statements from Daniel S. Sullivan in this video

“The New York Times article has the receipts.”
Asserts that the New York Times article contains evidence supporting claims against Mary Peltola.00:42-00:45
“The first order of business is to get with her campaign manager, her chief of staff, who actually joined her in the D.C. lobbying job, and Schumer's top DSCC staffers, not to go over, record or talk about what she wants in the campaign for her vision for Alaska, but to devise a secret plan to cheat and rig the election in her favor.”
Asserts that Mary Peltola's initial campaign actions involved planning to rig the election with her staff and DSCC officials.01:04-01:32
“They are devising this and doing regular updates almost weekly.”
Asserts that Mary Peltola's team was regularly updating the election rigging plan.01:59-02:05
“There's no way that this went on for a year, that they weren't informing her on it.”
Asserts that Mary Peltola was informed about the election rigging plan for a year.02:15-02:22