Paxton has endorsed him. What do you make of that as a characterization for this race? Well, I think people need to be very clear about what we voted for. We followed the Constitution. Put before us was the question of whether or not [Ken] Paxton should stand trial. Not one of us in the Texas House voted that he was innocent or guilty based on the Constitution. We were basically members of a grand jury. Does he stand? (01:11–01:20)
CLAIM
Asserts that the vote on Ken Paxton was constitutional and about whether he should stand trial.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
