A whistleblower came here to this committee with information that was disregarded. There is another person that's come forward to me through their … There is evidence that the nominee misled the committee. … truthful should be confirmed? Do you believe that understanding the intent of a question requires a nominee to answer it honestly and not try to evade the question because they understand the intent of the question? (06:56–07:04)
CLAIM
Asserts that there is evidence suggesting a nominee misled the committee.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.