But it does not change anything with ESA law or policy. Right. It seemed to be on page two of the bill, lines 13 through 16, it indicates that The covered entity, which is the Irrigation District, if it so requests, you'd have the continuing and routine opportunity to, to discuss and submit information to the action agency, quote, for consideration. So in no way dictates an outcome. Is that kind of what you're saying the bill is supposed to do throughout? That is correct. (01:15–01:30)
CLAIM
Asserts that the bill allows the Irrigation District to discuss and submit information to the action agency.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
