And then we're going to try to proactively engage with all of them of why is this asset retiring? Does it make sense? Is there a better plan here? And, and If it is retiring, what's going to replace it that's equally dispatchable and firm, reliable, and won't add to the cost of the grid or increase the either increase the cost or reduce the reliability of the grid. Good. My bill would bake what you're doing into law and basically require it so that before anybody could retire a unit in one of the regions that have an … (03:59–04:12)
CLAIM
Asserts the need for replacements of retiring assets to be equally reliable and cost-effective.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
