Sure. And I can comment on that case because it's been decided. If it were still pending, I would not be able to comment on it. So I agree with a decision that the 1849 law should not be implemented based on laws that had been passed since then that directly conflict with it. I think that that was the right decision by the majority on the state Supreme Court. Again, it was one vote. This really contrasts with my opponent. (04:08–04:20)
CLAIM
Asserts agreement with the decision not to implement the 1849 law due to conflicting newer laws.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
_(3x4).jpg)