You know, we think there was no new circumstances, no new facts other than just opponents of the rules, you know, weren't happy with them. I agree with you. And as we look at this, what, what happens then when Proxy advisors give bad advice, as seen in the Travelers example where a proxy advisor recommended what would have been an illegal action. and voted in favor of that. And then we see a robovoting move forward and we see over 40% of these asset managers agreeing with an illegal action that would have forced Travelers to reprice their insurance based on race. (03:28–03:33)
CLAIM
Asserts that proxy advisors have given bad advice, citing the Travelers example.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.