That's fine. But now we're in an age where half the stuff on these platforms is AI anyway, a lot of it is harming kids. And it seems to me that We need to clarify, either through the court system or through the legislature or both, what we actually originally meant by 230. So I'm interested in your thoughts. Well, yes, and I think the section 230 remains an important protection for online communication and for the free exchange of ideas. (02:15–02:23)
CLAIM
Asserts the need to clarify the original intent of Section 230 through legal or legislative means.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
