As a judicial conservative, it is. It's a philosophy, like you asked me about. Earlier. And a judicial conservative believes that the courts should be restrained when they're looking at a law. You interpret it the way the legislature wrote it, and you don't try to change it into some other form. The opposite is judicial activism or being a judicial liberal, where they believe that the court's role is to is to change the law into a form that they think is best. (07:50–07:57)
CLAIM
Asserts that judicial conservatives interpret laws as written by the legislature without altering them.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
