Makes sense. And. And with technologies like Starlink rapidly expanding, we're seeing that Service all throughout rural Ohio. Dramatically less expensive to put up a $200 receiver than a $2 million fiber cable up a mountain. Do you see that? Expanding service to remote areas at lower costs and faster development times. How is NTIA incorporating non traditional low earth satellite based solutions into its long term broadband strategy? (02:53–03:00)
CLAIM
Asserts that a $200 receiver is much cheaper than a $2 million fiber cable for rural connectivity.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
