Adam Schiff: “There's a provision that essentially would try to stop…”

“Okay, next question, next question. I am not going to hide the truth. So that provision that he's talking about there, he's being asked about, there was There's a provision that essentially would try to stop judges' ability to hold the president or the administration in contempt when they violate court orders. because what it would require is that someone suing to prevent the government from doing harm has to pay a big bond in case their temporary restraining order or permanent injunction is later reversed.” (05:16–05:43)

This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.