How has that made you more ineffective in some of these social welfare programs and your ability quite frankly to enforce those gaming laws you have on tribal lands? Thank you for that question. Tribes and states have, under the regulatory framework of the Indian Gaming Regulatory act, tribes and states have negotiated compact agreements to regulate activities like prediction market, online, illegal online sports betting, undermine our tribal sovereignty, state sovereignty and those very agreements in place that were designed to protect the integrity of the game, to protect consumers, to prevent against underage gambling, to promote responsible gambling. And you heard the question from the representative from Michigan, you know, the CFTC chair promoting lawlessness by advising these prediction market companies to ignore a court order. (02:31–02:57)
CLAIM
Asserts that tribes and states have negotiated agreements under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to regulate activities and protect sovereignty.
This is an excerpt from a raw transcript. The assertions have not been audited or verified. Tap the video to view the source footage and understand the context.
